ACCT 4400

Individual Assignment: Audit Planning

Assignment
Background: Capstone Core Objective Assessment

This assignment involves planning the audit for a
hypothetical audit client, and serves as a capstone assessment. By completing
this assignment, you will demonstrate each of the following core objectives:

·
Critical Thinking Skills (CT) – to include creative thinking, innovation, inquiry, and analysis,
evaluation and synthesis of information

·
Communication Skills (CS) – to include effective development, interpretation and expression of
ideas through written, oral and visual communication

·
Empirical and Quantitative Skills (EQS) – to include the manipulation and analysis of numerical data or
observable facts resulting in informed conclusions

·
Social Responsibility (SR) – to include intercultural competence,
knowledge of civic responsibility, and the ability to engage effectively in
regional, national, and global communities

The information
and questions needed to complete this assignment begin on page 2.


2015 Audit of Gamma
Industries: Summary of Information

Assume you are an audit manager, today is April 15, 2015,
and your public accounting firm is currently planning the 2015 financial
statement audit of Gamma Industries, a public company using a 12/31 year-end
(for this assignment, focus only on the financial statement audit). Gamma is a
new client for your firm. Gamma manufactures medical equipment, and sells these
machines to hospitals, out-patient surgery centers, and medical offices. The
audit partner has asked you to help plan the audit for this new client using the
following information obtained and summarized by the engagement team:

  • Ross Parker has been
    Gamma’s CEO for five years, and previously served as an executive vice
    president at Gamma for seven years. Before joining Gamma, Mr. Parker
    worked as an account manager at an advertising agency. A routine
    background check revealed one legal issue for Mr. Parker: he was arrested in
    1998 for driving while intoxicated, but the case was dismissed on a
    technicality.
  • Emily Fielder, CPA, is Gamma’s
    CFO and a former auditor. Mrs. Fielder has worked at Gamma in various
    positions for nearly two decades, and has been CFO for six years.
  • While Mr. Parker and Mrs.
    Fielder have provided consistency in the CEO and CFO positions,
    respectively, Gamma has experienced significant turnover among its
    accounting personnel. The majority of the current accounting staff do not
    have accounting degrees, although both the controller and chief accounting
    officer have master’s degrees in accounting.
  • Gamma received a qualified
    financial statement opinion for its 2014 financial statements from the
    predecessor audit firm. Mr. Parker explained that this opinion was due to
    disagreements over a subjective accounting estimate, the allowance for
    doubtful accounts. Communications with the predecessor audit firm, which
    are required by standards, were consistent with his explanation. These disagreements
    led the predecessor audit firm to resign after completing the 2014 audit.
  • The company’s executives
    receive a base salary and incentive-based compensation such as stock
    options and bonuses. For accounting and financial services personnel,
    Gamma implemented a policy last year that combines years of service and
    corporate performance to encourage stability and limit turnover. Due to
    this policy, Mrs. Fielder will receive a very large bonus if the company
    meets its 2015 Basic EPS forecast because she will pass twenty years of
    service late in 2015.

This morning, the audit senior for the Gamma audit, Eric
Wall, disclosed to you that his aunt owns a material (to her) amount of Gamma’s
common stock. Eric told you he does not believe his independence is impaired
and wishes to stay on the Gamma audit.

Please see the accompanying Excel file for Gamma’s 2014
financial statements.


Questions to Submit
to the Professor

These questions
address issues related to audit planning such as analytical procedures,
inherent risk assessment, and audit engagement staffing. Per the syllabus, you
must submit two versions: hard-copy in class on the due date and an electronic
version through Turnitin via Blackboard. You must also record the multiple
choice questions on the scantron provided by your instructor.

Questions

Part 1: Analytical
Procedures using the 2014 Financial Statements

  1. An auditor calculating Gamma’s
    quick ratio should exclude which of the following item(s) from current
    assets?
    1. Cash and equivalents
    2. Inventory
    3. Prepaid Expenses
    4. B & C only
  1. The numerator of Gamma’s
    receivables turnover is equal to
    1. Eighty percent of Gamma’s
      net sales
    2. Gamma’s cost of sales
    3. Gamma’s net sales
  1. An auditor calculating
    Gamma’s gross profit percentage should calculate gross profit as a
    percentage of
    1. Eighty percent of Gamma’s
      net sales
    2. Gamma’s cost of sales
    3. Gamma’s net sales
  1. An auditor calculating
    Gamma’s times interest earned ratio should include which financial
    statement item in both the
    numerator and denominator?
    1. Interest expense
    2. Net income
    3. Notes payable
  1. Assuming a 360 day year,
    Gamma’s days outstanding in accounts receivables is __ days.
    1. 66.94
    2. 67.87
    3. 73.89
  1. Gamma’s net profit margin is
    __ %.
    1. 3.49
    2. 5.68
    3. 8.45

  1. Gamma’s return on equity
    (ROE) is __ %.
    1. 0.81
    2. 3.02
    3. 4.57
  1. Gamma’s quick ratio is
    1. 0.30
    2. 2.72
    3. 4.62
  1. Assume Gamma’s usual
    credit terms are 2/10, net 30. Gamma’s days outstanding in accounts
    receivables suggests bad debts are likely __ to accounts receivable.
    1. Immaterial
    2. Material
    3. Neither A nor B: Bad
      debts have no relationship with accounts receivable
  1. Gamma’s profit margin,
    relative to the industry of average of 17.43%, suggests a __ level of
    detection risk.
    1. Low
    2. High
    3. Neither A nor B: profit
      margin is irrelevant to assessing detection risk
  1. Gamma’s ROA, relative to
    the industry average of 13.3%, suggests a __ level of inherent risk.
    1. Low
    2. High
    3. Neither A nor B: ROA is
      irrelevant to assessing inherent risk
  1. Gamma’s current ratio may
    be distorted because the company
    1. Has not fully depreciated
      and amortized all of its fixed assets
    2. Did not present diluted
      EPS in its financial statements
    3. Likely has a high level
      of bad debts

Part 2: Inherent Risk
(IR) Assessment

  1. List four issues
    from the summary information on p. 2 that could impact IR at Gamma

  1. Consider Gamma’s
    accounting and financial services personnel, including the controller,
    chief accounting officer, and CFO. What is your assessment of the
    collective competence of these employees? How does this assessment impact
    IR?
  1. What impact, if any, does
    the CEO’s (Mr. Parker) driving while intoxicated arrest in 1998 impact IR?
    Explain your answer.
  1. What is your IR
    assessment? Support your conclusion using both the summary information in
    this document and the 2014 financial statements, including the analytical
    procedures you performed in Part 1.

Part 3: Audit
Engagement Staffing

  1. Describe your
    responsibility to the public interest in considering Eric’s issue? How
    does this responsibility impact your consideration of whether to remove
    him from the Gamma audit?
  1. Will you allow Eric to
    serve on the Gamma audit? Explain your reasoning, including how investors
    and regulators might view his participation on the audit.
  1. If the average auditor in
    practice was in Eric’s position and was allowed to stay on the Gamma
    audit, could this person be objective (be sure to explain your answer)? What
    specific advice would you give this person on how to maintain her/his
    objectivity?